Showing posts with label Due Process. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Due Process. Show all posts

Monday, October 7, 2013

Watch Delusional Criminal Politicians, Not Law Abiding Harmless Civilians


Massachusetts Governor is a liberal Democrat plucked from the projects of Chicago by limousine liberals. He was sent to Milton Academy in Massachusetts for his prep schooling. Then on to Harvard College and Harvard Law School. In October 2013 he blamed the Tea Party Republicans for the government shut down. Huh? He appealed to God to forgive them. Ahem! A secular limousine liberal appeals to God for political purposes? Is this elitist black racist governor delusional? Psychiatric units at local hospitals have outreach squads who go out into the community to seek out "at risk" civilians. The outreach unit observes, tests, provokes, evaluates, contrary to state and US laws, law abiding citizens. If the targeted civilian does not get violent he or she is approved as "not" mentally ill after being tormented by these loving, caring, compassionate human services  providers. How often do they evaluate politicians who are clearly delusional? Not so much. Psychiatry's mission is not to protect individuals from illness, not to protect society from dangerous persons. Psychiatry is a business which provides licensed persons for hire by police, politicians, crime families to take freedom from individuals without due process and without evidence of crime or even dangerousness. Is it dangerous to the population of a a state to have delusional public officials? When will these caring, compassionate licensed professionals look at the delusional elected officials who are often criminals. And what about the delusional civilians who believe what the delusional politicians say. Are they as dangerous as the misguided elected criminal class? 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2448999/Miriam-Careys-sisters-say-NOT-delusional-tried-ram-car-White-House-barrier.html

Sisters of Miriam Carey say she was NOT delusional when she tried to ram her car through a White House barrier and question police officers' fatal use of force
Miriam Carey, 34, was fatally shot last week after going on a driving rampage through the nation's capital
Her sisters spoke this morning, saying they don't believe she was delusional when she fled from police
They were responding to statements Miriam's ex-boyfriend made about her saying she was 'communicating' with President Barack Obama
Since her death, police have discovered that she was taking medication to treat post-partum depression
By MEGHAN KENEALLY and ASHLEY COLLMAN
Daily Mail (UK)
PUBLISHED: 10:42 EST, 7 October 2013 | UPDATED: 15:50 EST, 7 October 2013



Monday, September 30, 2013

Cambridge City Council Passes Orders Contrary to Law. Are They Valid?

Published September 23, 2013 11:16 AM ET; Last updated September 30, 2013 7:57 PM ET

[This letter was published in the Cambridge Chronicle Thursday, September 26, 2013 print edition at page A11, and online at 
http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x511629963/LETTER-How-far-back-do-City-Council-violations-go

See my comments on Council order to have City Council learn Robert's Rule's of Order and their own rules in this video clip






In "Highlights from the City Council meeting," September 12, 2013, Erin Baldassari reported "the Attorney General [of Massachusetts], ruled in June [2013] that [the Council was] violating open meeting laws by co-sponsoring policy orders before voting on them." Not reported is how far back do these violations go? If the orders going back some months, years are illegal are they valid?

A related matter is the failure of the City Council to run its meetings according to its own rules, e.g., according to Robert's Rules of Order. About 7 years ago I reminded the Council repeatedly that they were not obeying their own rules. The response was to tell me I was violating a rule that they 

never enforced. 

 

Does the Council's weekly work have any legal worth? Why is the City Council permitted to violate Due Process requirements and the Open Meeting Law? Does the Council operate under direction of the President and Fellows of Harvard College, with permission to ignore inconvenient laws as long as they do not anger their master?



http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1837083976/60-SECONDS-Highlights-from-the-Cambridge-City-Council-meeting-Sept-9

60 SECONDS: Highlights from the Cambridge City Council meeting Sept. 9
By Erin Baldassari ebaldassari (at) wickedlocal.com
Cambridge Chronicle
Posted Sep 13, 2013 @ 11:08 AM

Monday, February 1, 2010

Gibbs and Holder Jeopardize Trials

Robert Gibbs, chief PR flack for Obama says that Kalid Sheik Mohammed will be executed and will go to see his maker before trial. Is he purposely trying to make it necessary to dismiss the charges due to bias? As Rush Limbaugh noted on Monday February 1, 2010 Gibbs, and Eric Holder too, want to negate the presumption of innocence and to guarantee due process rights to these enemy combatants. Are these guys amateurs?