John Adams: Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.
Aldous Huxley: Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Thomas Fuller: Get the facts, or the facts will get you. And when you get them, get them right, or they will get you wrong.
Obama Lost the Debate on Health Care: Unable to counter widespread concerns of citizens about his health care plans, Obama supporters conduct intense vitriolic attacks on critics. Obama has no rational arguments, and hopes to discredit his critics by character assassination. They are not just racists now they are greedy racists and hate mongers. Maybe that will work. Ya think? Obama-Biden: Stupid is as stupid does. Biden: "We misread how bad the economy was." Obama: [Correcting Biden]"We had incomplete information." So the US Congress voted for and the President signed a $787 billion stimulus bill without having read it, and with incomplete information? And they say others are stupid? Hello? Then Congress voted for a 1,000+ page "cap and trade" bill that none of them read. Bloomberg: Daschle says, "Health care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them," while former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm says seniors have "a duty to die." If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that the President, Senators and Congressmen have their own special gold plated health care plan which is guaranteed the remainder of their lives and they are not subject to this new law if they pass it. Reverse the dangerous direction of the Obama administration and its allies. Obama, The Un-Truman: David McCullough, in his biography of Harry Truman, "Truman" says on page 217, "Harry cared little more for other [than Huey Long] celebrated 'speechifiers' in the Senate. Admittedly fearful of making a speech himself, he seemed to resent particularly those who could and who made their reputations that way. They were the 'egotistical boys' whose specialty was talk." Obama admitted that he can make a speech but that he was incapable of doing anything in the Senate. Where did he gets his special powers during the campaign? Obama's Mantra: He keeps repeating, "I won the election." He expects all Americans to support what HE wants. "I won," is how Obama implements the post-partisan unification of America. What a guy! See also Rich Lowry's "Sorry, O: 'I won' Won't Cover this," New York Post, February 6, 2009, page 27. http://www.nypost.com/seven/02062009/postopinion/opedcolumnists sorry__o__i_won_wont_cover_this_153839.htm MIDDLESEX DA: We're too busy to address crimes less than murder. On Thursday June 25, 2009 Marian Ryan, who works for the Middlesex District Attorney in MA, returned my call from the previous day. She heads the unit for abuse of elders and abuse of persons with disabilities. She told me, "We've had four murders this month." That was to explain why she was unable to address 35 years of police abuses of a citizen with a disability now an elder. She said that a police officer making a threat did not rise to the level of a crime. She did not have time or resources to address abuses by the City Manager and the Police Commissioner of Cambridge, and the Harvard University campus police. It was no concern that using police to harass a person with a disability may be the reason for the four murders. MA Civil Rights statute and possession of illegal firearms are felonies, but not murder. Misallocation of resources is easily apparent. If the police focused on criminals instead of harassing elders with disabilities there might be less violent crime. But who was I to argue. Cambridge Censorship: In October 2009 City Council Candidate Kathy Podgers complained to Attorney Bill August, long term president of the Cambridgeport Neighborhood Association, that her posts to the neighborhood discussion lists were not appearing. Then Bob LaTremouille added his similar complaints. When I chimed in that my posts did n0t appear for many months Bill August accused me of libel. I said he ignored my complaints about censorship. For a lawyer he does not read very well. On one occasion in 2007 I sent a letter via Fedex from one part of Cambridge to another. I used Fedex because of frequent tampering with my mail by USPS employees. Mail was withheld by USPS employees, and some mail was intercepted and never got to where I sent it. The letter sent by Fedex never arrived either. Their tracking system ended before it was delivered. I wrote to the President of Fedex. He sent me a check for $25 to compensate me. What good is money if you can't send a letter from one part of a city to another? In June 2009 I sent a letter to a US Government agency complaining about a mobbed up police officer who was protecting criminals who harass me each day. Two days after I sent the letter the police detective appeared at a market as I shopped. He used a young woman as bait to try to have me arrested. In June 2009 someone opened a YouTube account solely to publish a comment attacking me personally. This is a frequent experience of an ongoing character assassination campaign by criminals and their police associates. A Harvard University attorney told me not to make complaints to their real estate offices but to the office of the General Counsel. The lawyer assigned was trying to deceive me. On June 6, 2009 I noticed a threat from a police officer as a comment under one of my videos posted on YouTube July 7, 2008. The video shows a Cambridge police patrol car parked in a bus stop. The officer was having dinner nearby not on an emergency call. Every day since I complained to the Attorney General about the threat Cambridge police or Harvard campus police follow me and try to provoke me. The Attorney General is married to a supervising Cambridge police officer. I learned on June 15, 2009 that the FBI was investigating me again. In May 2009, my comments on the Boston Herald web pages (a public accommodation) were removed allegedly due to violations of guidelines. When I complained one was restored. Interns referred me to a staff writer when three of my comments about the shooting death at a Harvard dorm were removed. Someone unknown to me posted a picture of a man from the city in my YouTube profile. That means that someone is tampering with my YouTube account. That is a felony under US law. On or about December 12, 2008 my name was removed from two neighborhood discussion lists--Riverside and Cambridgeport. My attempts to be put back on were ignored by the former President of the Riverside neighborhood, Larry Adkins. Cambridgeport moderators opened my new access in February 2009. In May 2009 I received messages from the list but was unable to post messages. Last year I was unable to receive or post messages to the Porter Square neighborhood discussion list. No notice there either. They began a new list this year and I now get messages. But I was the target of personal attacks on the Porter Square list, the Cambridgeport discussions and on the Cambridge Chronicle web pages. An FBI informant who maintains a web site about the City of Cambridge ridicules me and others who he believes have disabilities. My account with YouTube (more than 250 videos posted) was shut in August 2008 and my appeals of Fair Use Doctrine were ignored. On April 15, 2009 my YouTube account was re-opened. Emily Rooney, host of the PBS news show, Greater Boston threatened to have me banned from Boston. Cambridge City Councilor and Harvard lawyer, Brian Murphy, who resigned in February 2009 to take a six-figure job with the state used council rules to silence my expression. These are rules that the Council created but ignore at every meeting. An email account I used specially for discussion lists was shut down with no notice and no reason or warning given. My several emails inquiring why have been ignored. That account was re-opened on February 10, 2009. Google Video flagged and blocked four uploaded episodes of a cable access TV show I produced and hosted on CCTV. When I appealed their decision, they agreed to put it back up. But as of this date one remains blocked. In February 2009 a long term producer of documentaries at CCTV told me "There is no such thing as Free Speech." That was the second time someone in Cambridge said that to me.
This is a video of a radio frequency scan of Bonnie Kellerby. This is only one of thousands of victims of Domestic Terrorism on United States soil.
This video describes the seriousness of domestic terrorism in America. California Senate Bill 362 makes it illegal to force any huamn being to be inplanted with a rfid device against consent. This is being done to thousands of innocent Americans.
Interview with British Microwave expert Barrie Trower.
By: Natural Science - http://naturalscience.org
This short excerpt, of the original video (2 Hours 20 Minutes) only deals with the Microwave warfare aspect.
More Videos on this topic: http://www.youtube.com/user/bradley22ist
A segment from Popular Science's The Future Of Security aired on The
Science Channel. Device manufactured by Eureka Aerospace Corporation. Posted on YouTube on January 13, 2010.
Popular Science: Eureka Aerospace's system consists of a suitcase-sized antenna that weighs roughly 50-55lbs, and can supposedly stop cars in their tracks up to 656 feet (200 m) away.
The first segment from the same broadcast covered through-the-wall imaging -- another of Eureka's projects. See it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_3U4y...
A related story covered by Fox 11 News (LA):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk6HSq...
Did Rush Limbaugh's non heart attack result from an attack of electrical weapons to make him think he was having a heart attack? What was he doing when it happened?
Technology Gives Criminals and Terrorists Advantage
"Fox News: The terrorists carried handheld GPS navigators, satellite phones, BlackBerrys and data CDs containing detailed maps and Google Earth images of where they were going." These are are consumer devices that are well-known to most tech savvy citizens. But there are more sophisticated devices using advanced technology which are used for military anti personnel weapons on unsuspecting civilians for nefarious purposes. Unless there is widespread harm journalists ignore these abuses of individuals. Local police are clueless about these technologies and how to curb criminal use on civilians. This story is less than the tip of the iceberg.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,461084,00.html
and
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/02/AR2008120203519.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/5d8tvy
Gunmen Used Technology as A Tactical Tool
Mumbai Attackers Had GPS Units, Satellite Maps
By Emily Wax
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Page A01
Roy Bercaw petitions the Cambridge MA City Council to address human experimentation abuses, experimental drugs, high tech electrical weapons, disability rights, Fernald School, Radiation Experiments, Nazi Doctors, Pulsed Microwaves, Less Lethal weapons, non lethal weapons, Harvard University, MIT, European parliament, Psychiatry, Human Rights Commission, Mass Commission Against Discrimination, Donald Stern, Mass General Hospital, McLean's Hospital.
Roy Bercaw discusses Harvard University and the Americans with Disabilities Act, TAGS Hardware, Simon Shapiro, Lexington Historic Commission, Wheelchair access, BIOGEN Human Experimentation, Adverse Events, MIT radiation experiments, Mass General Hospital, Anthony Roisman, Informed Consent, Militarization of police, Non Lethal weapons, less lethal weapons, electrical weapons, domestic adversaries, DoJ Experiments, Electrical surveillance, through the wall technology, psychiatry, Cold War, Sidney Gottleib, LSD, Technical Services Division, CIA, Seinfeld, Jessica Sklar, Michael Mello.
In this clip from FOX25 News Boston Molly Line shows the use of "The Rumbler," a low frequency sound device by Boston Police to complement their sirens. They are used to alert motorists that the police are on an emergency call. The same kind of technology is being used as electrical harassment weapons by corporations, organized crime and other interested parties to discredit and to disable their critics, and unpopular persons in general. Mass state law prohibits possession of such devices for non law enforcement purposes. See Mass General Laws Chapter 140, Section 131 J.
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/140-131j.htm
With New Device, Police Shake, Rattle and Roll
D.C.'s High-Tech 'Rumbler' Siren Emits a Low-Frequency Vibe You Can Feel
By Allison Klein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 29, 2007; B01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/28/AR2007102801465.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/yswkpv
Manufacturer's home page at
http://www.fedsig.com/index.php
* * *
[New article at]
Police Use Invisible Technology
"the sirens 'have the distinct advantage of penetrating and shaking solid materials, allowing vehicle operators and nearby pedestrians to FEEL the sound waves"
"the sirens and speakers may cause hearing damage 'to anyone exposed to them on a daily basis."
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/cops_super_sirens_get_ready_to_rumble_iRuabQC6Bb8gQhEKvk4P3L
Cops' super-sirens get ready to rumble
By BRAD HAMILTON, JOHN DOYLE and CYNTHIA R. FAGEN
New York Post
Last Updated: 7:35 AM, October 25, 2009
Posted: 2:49 AM, October 25, 2009
Nick Begich is the son of US Rep. Nick Begich who was killed in a plane crash with Hale Boggs, who was Speaker of the US House of Representatives. Nick Jr. gets US taxpayer grants to publish and to educate the public about new technology. Part 1 of 3 is about external influencing the brain electronically. Begich says that the US government has a history of using human subjects for experiments without consent. But he says that many people who claim they are such subjects of this electronic experimentation, are suffering from other difficulties, e.g., psychiatric problems. It seems as if Begich is revealing the technology and at the same time providing cover for abuses of human subjects.
Part 2 of 3. In this section Begich reports an experiment on students diagnosed with ADD and ADHD who were subjected to electronic conditioning using a "helmet." He says they were able to return to regular education classes and that it cost the school district less money than if they needed the special ed classes. He approves of using electronics for brain control and treatment. He also tells of treatment in Finland which was challenged by the traditional physicians in court.
Part 3 of 3. In this section Begich suggests that it is now possible to "download" information to the human brain. That this will be an issue for public education in this country. Who will decide what gets put into children's brains? Parents or the government?
Here are some prototypes of electrical anti personnel weapons developed for military use. They are being deployed to local law enforcement, with the usual abuses by police, organized crime families, psychologists and human researchers. Government critics, whistle blowers, unpopular citizens, and vulnerable persons are targeted by criminal use. In Cambridge, MA police are not trained to enforce a 1986 state law prohibiting possession of these weapons.
Graduate psychology and psychiatric students at prominent universities are trained to use these weapons on vulnerable persons. Cities and towns employ them to censor critics and to cover up malfeasance and corruption.
Brief video clips (from November 21, 2000) of experimental acoustic weapons and electromagnetic radiation weapons used by police. Derivative types are used by criminals with police untrained to stop their use for harassment and criminal abuse.
Here is the MA state law:
PART I. ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT
TITLE XX. PUBLIC SAFETY AND GOOD ORDER
CHAPTER 140. LICENSES
SALE OF FIREARMS
Chapter 140: Section 131J.
Sale or possession of electrical weapons; penalties
Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate temporarily, injure or kill, except: (1) a federal, state or municipal law enforcement officer, or member of a special reaction team in a state prison or designated special operations or tactical team in a county correctional facility, acting in the discharge of his official duties who has completed a training course approved by the secretary of public safety in the use of such a devise or weapon designed to incapacitate temporarily; or (2) a supplier of such devices or weapons designed to incapacitate temporarily, if possession of the device or weapon is necessary to the supply or sale of the device or weapon within the scope of such sale or supply enterprise. No person shall sell or offer for sale such device or weapon, except to federal, state or municipal law enforcement agencies. A device or weapon sold under this section shall include a mechanism for tracking the number of times the device or weapon has been fired. The secretary of public safety shall adopt regulations governing who may sell or offer to sell such devices or weapons in the commonwealth and governing law enforcement training on the appropriate use of portable electrical weapons.
Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 21/2 years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. A law enforcement officer may arrest without a warrant any person whom he has probable cause to believe has violated this section.
