Showing posts with label Surveillance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Surveillance. Show all posts
Monday, August 25, 2014
Collecting Data About Everyone
CBS News
60 Minutes
August 24, 2014
The Data Brokers
at this link
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/the-data-brokers-selling-your-personal-information-2
US Sen. Jay Rockefeller's proposed bill.
Labels:
Cell Phones,
Data Mining,
Facebook,
Internet,
Personal Information,
Privacy,
Surveillance
Saturday, December 14, 2013
MIT Develops Through-The-Wall Tracking Technology
http://www.engadget.com/2013/12/11/mit-3d-motion-tracking-tech-can-see-you-through-walls/
MIT's 3D motion-tracking tech can see you through walls, no camera needed
BY JOSEPH VOLPE
December 11, 2013
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Televisions Can Watch Viewers
http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/01/technology/security/tv-hack/index.html?iid=HP_River
Your TV might be watching you
By Erica Fink and Laurie Segall @CNNMoney
August 1, 2013: 11:32 AM ET
Your TV might be watching you
By Erica Fink and Laurie Segall @CNNMoney
August 1, 2013: 11:32 AM ET
Sunday, June 30, 2013
Serial NJ Burglar, Accused Attempted Murder Never Under Surveillance

[From article]
Custis, whose last known address was on Irvine Turner Boulevard in Newark, has 12 felony convictions dating back to the early 1990s. He was most recently jailed in connection with a string of burglaries across New Jersey in March 2011 and served 10 months

Here's one more gentleman who was committing violent crimes and no one was watching him. But after 40 years of criminal abuses by police, crime families and Communists, Harvard University campus cops, Somerville, and Boston police take turns continuing 24/7/365 surveillance and harassment of a law abiding 70-year-old white male with a legal disability. Criminals are free to go about their business while police resources are focused on harmless individuals for the sadistic historical retaliation of misguided victims, women, black people and homosexuals. Taxpayer funded public safety resources have curious priorities in Massachusetts. Lawyers employed by the Civil Rights Division of the Massachusetts Attorney General's office participate after diverting a call to the Disability Rights Division. District Attorney's Elder Abuse unit too busy. Major focus on same sex marriage and high school student bullies. Silence about 60 homicides by organized criminal gangs in Boston working with the FBI.
http://www.nj.com/essex/index.ssf/2013/06/suspect_in_vicious_millburn_beating_may_have_gone_into_other_apartments_neighbors_say.html#incart_river
Suspect in vicious Millburn beating may have gone into other apartments, NYC woman says
By Star-Ledger Staff
on June 30, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Monday, June 17, 2013
Does Gov't Conduct Surveillance Because It Cares About Us?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2343230/Overly-attached-girlfriend-takes-NSA-land-free-ish--kinda-hilarious-Youtube-video.html
'Don't be scared, I watch you because I care': 'Overly attached girlfriend' mocks the NSA and the 'land of the free-ish...kinda' in hilarious Youtube video
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
PUBLISHED: 10:22 EST, 17 June 2013 | UPDATED: 16:42 EST, 17 June 2013
Labels:
Compassion,
Government Abuses,
Love,
Surveillance
Facebook, Google Mislead Users About Gov't Intrusions
http://washingtonexaminer.com/edward-snowden-google-and-facebook-misleading-their-users/article/2532005
Edward Snowden: Google and Facebook 'misleading' their users
BY: CHARLIE SPIERING
JUNE 17, 2013 | 12:08 PM
Labels:
Facebook,
Google,
Government Abuses,
Personal Information,
Surveillance
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Previous Government Surveillance Under Echelon Reads Everything
http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/echelon-contractor-feds-spying-on-citizens-for-decades/
LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
MICHAEL SAVAGE CALLER: AMERICANS SPIED ON FOR DECADES
'They're listening to everything. They know what everybody does'
June 13, 2013
Labels:
Abuse of Power,
Echelon,
Government Abuses,
Privacy,
Surveillance
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Do You Have A Secret?
Published on Nov 6, 2012
"The NSA had been engaged in 'over collection' of domestic communications of Americans. They describe the practice as significant and systemic"' The New York Times
The Cyber Security Act 2012 will allow the government to spy on your searches, emails, chats, photos etc and use them against you for any purpose. Currently, the Government can't invade your privacy without a warrant and if companies share your data improperly, you can sue them.....
http://www.doyouhaveasecret.org/
The Cyber Security Act 2012 will allow the government to spy on your searches, emails, chats, photos etc and use them against you for any purpose. Currently, the Government can't invade your privacy without a warrant and if companies share your data improperly, you can sue them.....
http://www.doyouhaveasecret.org/
Monday, July 30, 2012
Smart Meters Surveillance Devices Spying on Your Home and Family
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/smart-1/smart-meters-surveillance-devices-spying-onyour-home-and-family.html
Have you heard about the new "smart meters" that are being installed in homes all across America? Under the guise of "reducing greenhouse gas emissions" and "reducing energy bills", utility companies all over the United States are forcing tens of millions of American families to accept sophisticated surveillance devices in their homes. Currently, approximately 9 percent of all electric meters in the U.S. have been converted over to smart meters. It is being projected that by 2012, the number of smart meters in use will rise to 52 million, and the federal government is spending a lot of money to help get these installed everywhere. Eventually the goal is to have these smart meters in all of our homes and if that ever happened there would essentially be no more privacy. Once installed, a smart meter monitors your home every single minute of every single day and it transmits very sophisticated data about your personal behavior back to the utility company.
Friday, February 3, 2012
Dan Rea and ACLUM's Kade Crockford Discuss High Tech Surveillance
On Feb 2, 2012 Kade Crockford (ACLU Massachusetts, Privacy Rights Coordinator) appeared on Dan Rea's Nightside WBZ radio show broadcast from Boston MA. She noted that the ACLU's focus is on government abuses of technology, referring concerns of private abuses to other consumer privacy groups. Query, How much difference is there between government and private in 2012? The FBI and police use informants who are often private criminals. Crime families, corporations and Communists have associates in and out of government. They talk to one another. Police ask crime families to do them favors, and vice versa. Likewise the FBI.
Ordinary citizens cannot defend themselves against technology to protect their rights and privacy. Crockford expressed curiosity that local, state and federal politicians, who she described as high profile, did not work to protect themselves from such technological abuses. Today's politicians work with, if not for, the police and the FBI. They are weak persons (often described as spineless) with relaxed rectitude, like their corporate contributors. They do not defend the Constitution as per their oaths of office. They go along to get along. They encourage technological abuses of citizens who criticize them too enthusiastically. Police and the FBI are unable or unwilling to enforce the few laws that do exist regarding technology. Mentioned on air was the use of thermal imaging by police and by private citizens. Local police claim ignorance of how to enforce the few laws that exist. They are, if their leadership is to be believed, clueless on how to enforce laws on technological abuses. That is negligent training, which is actionable. A US law prohibits exposing citizens to radiation, and carries a $2 million fine. How do civilians get that law enforced?
Crockford said the uses of red spotlights in East Orange, NJ should be discussed within the context of what else is going on in society with surveillance technology.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9064107/Talking-CCTV-cameras-to-be-turned-off.html
Talking CCTV cameras to be turned off
Camden Council has said its new generation of talking, closed-circuit TV cameras were 'activated by mistake' and will have their voices turned off.
By Matt Warman, Consumer Technology Editor
2:23PM GMT 06 Feb 2012
The same argument must be made regarding the use of technology by both government and by private criminals, who are unlikely to respect Constitutional Rights of citizens they target. Massachusetts has a Civil Rights statute that makes acts of private individuals a felony if they intimidate a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally protected right. Technological abuses by police and the FBI must be discussed recognizing the blurring of the line between public and private. Police and crime families cooperate. The FBI and crime families cooperate. The FBI and Communists cooperate. Police and the FBI cooperate with corporations e.g., drug companies. Working with psychiatrists and psychologists using technology, drug corporations target critics of their dangerous drugs and taxpayer funded programs forcing drugs on civilians.
They all use the same technology. Crockford noted the difference between public and private saying the government can put you in jail. But crime families, corporations and Communists can also have police or the FBI put you in jail. Is the ACLU clueless about that happening? That is an unpleasant fact in the United States today. What is the difference whether technology is used by private criminals or police criminals to violate a person's rights? Police or the FBI can legally refuse to stop criminal abuses of technology because it suits them. There is no legal obligation which forces police to act. The effect is the same. The ACLU should reconsider its focus to include when the government uses private persons to avoid Constitutional protections, and when government refuses to stop the same private abuses of technology.
Ordinary citizens cannot defend themselves against technology to protect their rights and privacy. Crockford expressed curiosity that local, state and federal politicians, who she described as high profile, did not work to protect themselves from such technological abuses. Today's politicians work with, if not for, the police and the FBI. They are weak persons (often described as spineless) with relaxed rectitude, like their corporate contributors. They do not defend the Constitution as per their oaths of office. They go along to get along. They encourage technological abuses of citizens who criticize them too enthusiastically. Police and the FBI are unable or unwilling to enforce the few laws that do exist regarding technology. Mentioned on air was the use of thermal imaging by police and by private citizens. Local police claim ignorance of how to enforce the few laws that exist. They are, if their leadership is to be believed, clueless on how to enforce laws on technological abuses. That is negligent training, which is actionable. A US law prohibits exposing citizens to radiation, and carries a $2 million fine. How do civilians get that law enforced?
Crockford said the uses of red spotlights in East Orange, NJ should be discussed within the context of what else is going on in society with surveillance technology.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9064107/Talking-CCTV-cameras-to-be-turned-off.html
Talking CCTV cameras to be turned off
Camden Council has said its new generation of talking, closed-circuit TV cameras were 'activated by mistake' and will have their voices turned off.
By Matt Warman, Consumer Technology Editor
2:23PM GMT 06 Feb 2012
The same argument must be made regarding the use of technology by both government and by private criminals, who are unlikely to respect Constitutional Rights of citizens they target. Massachusetts has a Civil Rights statute that makes acts of private individuals a felony if they intimidate a person in the free exercise of a constitutionally protected right. Technological abuses by police and the FBI must be discussed recognizing the blurring of the line between public and private. Police and crime families cooperate. The FBI and crime families cooperate. The FBI and Communists cooperate. Police and the FBI cooperate with corporations e.g., drug companies. Working with psychiatrists and psychologists using technology, drug corporations target critics of their dangerous drugs and taxpayer funded programs forcing drugs on civilians.
They all use the same technology. Crockford noted the difference between public and private saying the government can put you in jail. But crime families, corporations and Communists can also have police or the FBI put you in jail. Is the ACLU clueless about that happening? That is an unpleasant fact in the United States today. What is the difference whether technology is used by private criminals or police criminals to violate a person's rights? Police or the FBI can legally refuse to stop criminal abuses of technology because it suits them. There is no legal obligation which forces police to act. The effect is the same. The ACLU should reconsider its focus to include when the government uses private persons to avoid Constitutional protections, and when government refuses to stop the same private abuses of technology.
Labels:
Dan Rea,
Kade Crockford,
Privacy,
Surveillance,
Technology
Monday, November 28, 2011
Under Siege Movie
Joyce Riley, RN discusses Teen Screening and use of microwave weapons on civilian population along with many serious abuses of the US Government. Movie is 1 hour 20 minutes.
**movie info at bottom of this box**
download another great movie The Money Masters for burning to DVD at mininova free of charge:
http://www.mininova.org/tor/1023785
**Movie Info (One Nation Under Siege**
Through the research and personal testimony of over a dozen internationally distinguished authors, journalists, doctors, and military experts you will begin to understand the massive and ceaseless control projected onto an unsuspecting populace by a government that may have finally crossed the line from a representative republic to a fascist empire. From the USA PATRIOT Act and the blatant disregard for the Bill of Rights to the outright tracking of every human being on the planet earth, you will be stunned by what U.S. government documents describe for the future of America.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Harvard Students Meet Outdoors
Harvard students meet outdoors to avoid government and administration surveillance in the classrooms. Their stategy when it gets cold has not been determined.
Labels:
Classrooms,
Harvard University,
Students,
Surveillance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

